First-party only — a session id and where you arrived from, so we can tell which pages are worth writing more of. No advertising, no third-party trackers, nothing that follows you off this site.
Both are on this list because they are genuinely good at something. The question is which something you need. Below is the factual comparison, then the honest answer about who each one is for.
Reviewed July 25, 2026 · pricing changes often, check the vendor
| Cursor | Zed | |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Anysphere | Zed Industries |
| Where it runs | Editor | Editor |
| Models | Multiple providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and others, selectable | Multiple providers, or bring your own key |
| Pricing | Free tier · Pro $20/mo · higher tiers for heavy use | Editor free · AI features on free and paid tiers |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Best for | Developers who want AI woven into the editing loop itself rather than sitting in a separate window. | People who care about editor latency above all and want AI in the same window. |
The inline prediction is the strongest reason to use it — it is a different experience from chat
Model choice per task rather than being locked to one vendor
Rules files keep project conventions in front of the model without re-pasting
You are adopting an editor, not adding a feature to the one you have
Usage accounting across tiers and models is genuinely confusing
Agent mode over large refactors still needs close supervision
Input latency is noticeably better than Electron-based editors
Collaborative editing is native, not an extension
Open source core
Extension ecosystem is small next to VS Code
Agent features are newer and less deep than the specialists
Some language tooling still lags
Pick Cursor if developers who want AI woven into the editing loop itself rather than sitting in a separate window.
Pick Zed if people who care about editor latency above all and want AI in the same window.
And a thing worth saying plainly: the gap between these two is smaller than the gap between a repo that tells an agent what it is and one that does not. If you are choosing between them to fix inconsistent output, the tool is probably not the variable. The free Foundations track covers the part that is.